Pharmacovigilance learning module: Adverse drug reactions
Important informationThis learning module has now been superseded by a new module developed by BMJ Learning in close collaboration with the MHRA. Pharmacovigilance – identifying and reporting adverse drug reactions: in association with the MHRA (external link)
In a recent 10-year survey, around 1% of hospital admissions in England were for drug-related causes and 4 - 5% of patients admitted to hospital for adverse drug reactions died. Different methodologies and settings for the two studies may go towards explaining the difference in prevalence, but, clearly, adverse reactions to medicines contribute very substantially to serious illness and early death. Some adverse effects are unavoidable or unpredictable, but with a correct approach to using medicines, the burden of adverse drug reactions can be reduced considerably. The terms adverse drug reactions and adverse events are not interchangeable. Whereas an adverse drug reaction can be attributed with some confidence to the action of a drug (opens in a new window), an adverse event simply describes an unwanted outcome that occurs, regardless of whether a medicine has been used or is implicated. Clinical trials (opens in a new window) record adverse events, but not all of these will be caused by the study drugs.
Additional categories have been proposed, some to accommodate the time course of the reaction:
The alphabetical categories can be extended even further: type F (failure), type G (genetic/genomic), type H (hypersensitivity)… The type A/type B classification of adverse drug reactions, while widely cited, does not characterise all reactions effectively. Classification along multiple axes—dose-relatedness, time-relatedness and susceptibility (DoTS)—overcomes many of the difficulties.
< PreviousNext >Page 2 of 15 |
||
| Page last modified: 05 February 2013 |